Policy Submission: World Wide Web Consortium Accessibility Consultation
If you have any issue accessing this document please let us know and we will try our best to resolve the issue. You can reach us on 08 8373 8333 or email@example.com
JFA Purple Orange made this comment on the ‘World Wide Web Consortium Accessibility Consultation’ to the Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines Working Group. JFA and its predecessor organisations have been involved with the disability community for 130 years and strongly supports the values of Personal Authority, Social Inclusion and Capacity Building. JFA strongly supports web accessibility, both for the capacity of web authors and most importantly for the convenience of the end users of web content.
Guideline A.3.2: (For the authoring tool user interface). Minimise time limits on authors.
The Julia Farr Association supports the rationale that people who have difficulty typing, operating the mouse, or processing information can be prevented from using systems with short time limits. The Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines have proposed that authors are given a 20 second extended time limit to complete an action with a warning signal. JFA proposes that this time limit be further extended to ensure a person has adequate time to continue or complete a task.
Guideline A.4.2 (For the authoring tool user interface). Document the user interface including all accessibility features.
The Julia Farr Association supports the idea of providing tutorials to web authors and the provision of support documentation on accessible features for authors to read. However, we recommend that the documentation also include a comprehensive list of what accessibility means across a range of disabilities. For example; there are font/background colour considerations for a person with low vision, audio considerations for a blind person, and colour, shape and pattern considerations for a person who has photosensitive epilepsy.
Guideline B.3.1: Ensure that accessible authoring actions are given prominence.
Julia Farr Association supports the view that web content is made accessible to authors and users of the web. Many authors may not be aware of which authoring tools are accessible and for whom they are intended. Therefore JFA recommends that accessible tool options are highlighted, with an explanation of their desired outcome and audience, as a means to encourage their use. To encourage authors to use an accessible feature over a non-accessible feature JFA suggests that when authors are provided with multiple options for an authoring task, a drop-down box is included with a symbol to let authors know what features are accessible and an explanation behind the intended accessibility feature.
Guideline B.2.4: Assist authors with managing alternative content for non-text content.
The Working Group has requested feedback on Guideline B.2.4 on whether the guideline is clear on how it would apply to content management systems or photo repository sites. JFA did not find the guideline clear. JFA recommends the following options for consideration:
- After the sentence provide an example the nature of alternative content, such as, ‘This includes types of alternative content that may not typically be displayed on screen by user agents (Level A). For example….
- There was no mention of the words ‘photo repository sites’ in the guideline or any explanation in the glossary. A person who does not have previous knowledge of this term may not know what this means and how it would apply.
- JFA encourages the use of ‘plain english’ to make the Guideline and document easier to read and understand for all people.